Re: tracking-ISSUE-93: Should 1st parties be able to degrade a user experience or charge money for content based on DNT? [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]

Thanks for adding on my behalf Aleecia. Creating this as a question separate
from issue 59 re notification of 1st parties makes sense.

Carmen
-- 
Carmen Balber
Washington Director
Consumer Watchdog
413 E. Capitol St. SE, 1st Floor
Washington, D.C  20003
p:(202) 629-3043
http://www.consumerwatchdog.org


On 10/19/11 3:05 PM, "Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker"
<sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:

> 
> tracking-ISSUE-93: Should 1st parties be able to degrade a user experience or
> charge money for content based on DNT? [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/93
> 
> Raised by: Aleecia McDonald
> On product: Tracking Definitions and Compliance
> 
> [Note: raised by Carmen, who is working through W3C paperwork]
> 
> We would be leery of first parties being able to penalize consumers (for
> example, with a pay wall, blocking content entirely, or perhaps by other
> means) because consumers implemented Do Not Track.
> 
>

Received on Thursday, 20 October 2011 20:29:53 UTC