Re: Actor Type: Org

The reason it was removed was due to lack of justifiable use cases....
Specifically, none of the user stories adopted by the WG required an
Organization object type being part of the core... Especially given that
there are other vocabs available that cover Organization adequately.
On Jun 29, 2015 7:18 PM, "Renato Iannella" <ri@semanticidentity.com> wrote:

> Hi, I am trying to trace the ISSUE-35 [1] decision on removing some Actor
> Types.
> There seems to be a resolution email [2] but can’t seem to find the actual
> reasons behind the decisions (based on “justifiable use cases”).
>
> I am wondering why “Organisation” was removed in particular?
>
> There seems to be common use case for Orgs in Social Networks.
> (Eg W3C follows Tim on Twitter)
>
> Cheers...
> Renato Iannella
> Semantic Identity
> http://semanticidentity.com
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/Social/track/issues/35
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-socialweb/2015Apr/0034.html
>
>