- From: Jim McCusker <mccusj@rpi.edu>
- Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 07:58:23 -0500
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
This is a misunderstanding of a URI literal versus URI resource. When a URI resource is used, it can link to that resource when it has assertions made about it. This is not possible or intended with URI literals. Jim On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 2:36 AM, Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: > Hi Tim, > > But doesn't this include URIs by means of typed literals? > > Professor Luc Moreau > Electronics and Computer Science > University of Southampton > Southampton SO17 1BJ > United Kingdom > > On 6 Nov 2011, at 01:20, "Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker" <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: > >> >> PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/142 >> >> Raised by: Timothy Lebo >> On product: Data Model >> >> prov-dm, 5.5.1 Qualifier: >> >> "The value associated with a role attribute must be conformant with Literal." >> >> >> >> Will this prevent PROV-O from using URIs to cite roles? >> >> Restricting roles to literals will be severely limiting for PROV-O and semantic web applications, since literals cannot be described or served as linked data, and thus consumers will be unable to determine more information about what the role means. >> >> >> > > > -- Jim McCusker Programmer Analyst Krauthammer Lab, Pathology Informatics Yale School of Medicine james.mccusker@yale.edu | (203) 785-6330 http://krauthammerlab.med.yale.edu PhD Student Tetherless World Constellation Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute mccusj@cs.rpi.edu http://tw.rpi.edu
Received on Sunday, 6 November 2011 12:59:15 UTC