Re: Comma separation in functional syntax (filters, transforms) from Tab Atkins Jr. on 2011-12-13 (public-fx@w3.org from October to December 2011)

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 07:47:34 -0800
To: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
Cc: public-fx@w3.org
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDBh+9pA0q7gav+YvY5_KUqOShH9Pta9K1_nPVCmajNXKA@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote:
> CSS Filters [1] is using a comma-free syntax for arguments to the filter functions. This leads to things like:
>
>  filter: gamma(0.5 0.2 0.2);
>
> I think it's wrong for this to be different to transforms[2], which currently uses commas. We have to do one or the other, not mix and match.
>
> Simon
>
> [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/FXTF/raw-file/tip/filters/index.html#FilterFunction
> [2] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-2d-transforms/

This change was made at my request to match other functions which we
are attempting to develop in a comma-less manner when possible.

~TJ

Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2011 03:05:03 UTC