Re: shapes-ISSUE-162 (section 1.2 editorial): [EDITORIAL] Section 1.2 [SHACL Spec]

Thank you PEter,

your edit suggestions are now online
https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/f481a275de75044a5804c0c4aa23c4c9722cd2cc

You may close the issue if it is tackled

Best,
Dimitris

On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 5:02 PM, RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue
Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:

> shapes-ISSUE-162 (section 1.2 editorial): [EDITORIAL] Section 1.2 [SHACL
> Spec]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/162
>
> Raised by: Peter Patel-Schneider
> On product: SHACL Spec
>
> Throughout the document, color-coded boxes containing RDF in Turtle markup
> will appear.
>
> I don't think that "Turtle markup" is the right term for this.   I suggest
>
> Throughout the document, color-coded boxes showing RDF graphs in Turtle
> will appear.  These fragments of Turtle document use the prefix bindings
> given above.
>
>
>
> Throughout the life of this document "focus node" meant a node that was
> being validated against a shape or constraint.  Thus
>
> # Elements highlighted in blue are focus nodes that
> # are selected by shape scopes and filters
>
> is somewhat misleading and should be replaced by
>
> # Elements highlighted in blue are nodes that
> # are selected by some scope of a shape under discussion
> # and validate against the shape's filters, if any
>
>
>
>


-- 
Dimitris Kontokostas
Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig & DBpedia Association
Projects: http://dbpedia.org, http://rdfunit.aksw.org,
http://aligned-project.eu
Homepage: http://aksw.org/DimitrisKontokostas
Research Group: AKSW/KILT http://aksw.org/Groups/KILT