Re: ISSUE-201: Aligning the two change proposals

hi Maciej,

since it would be pretty much the same as ted's except for some minor
changes to the unbacked hit region() stuff I could have it done within 10
days.

would be sooner except I am travelling for work.

regards
SteveF

On 11 July 2012 22:09, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote:

>
> Can you offer a date by which you could have a new CP ready?
>
>  - Maciej
>
> On Jul 11, 2012, at 5:35 AM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi chairs,
>
> As we don't appear to be able to reach consensus on the 'unbacked regions'
> aspect of ted's proposal.
> Wondering if it makes sense for me to start work on a CP?
>
>
>
> regards
> SteveF
>
> On 6 July 2012 08:16, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ted,
>>
>> thank you for persevering.
>>
>> you wrote:
>>
>> "Each hit region has an associated control, which is either an element or
>> an unbacked region description. You pass in the control when you call
>> addHitRegion()."
>>
>> reading
>> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/the-canvas-element.html#hit-regions
>>
>> to clarify, regions only have a control when they have an associated
>> element. so unbacked regions don't have a control right?
>>
>> As unbacked regions cannt be focusable and cannot have additional author
>> defined properties it does not make any sense for ARIA roles that are for
>> interactive objects.
>>
>> If the list of roles allowed on unbacked regions is constrained to those
>> that make sense, then I could live with the rest of the concept.
>>
>> So I suggest either the list of roles that can be used or the list of
>> roles that cannot be used be defined so no one is under any illusion that
>> unbacked regions can make representations of controls, for example a
>> button, accessible.
>>
>> Below is a suggested list of allowed ARIA roles:
>>
>> subset of document structure roles
>>
>>    - article <http://roles/#article>
>>    - group <http://roles/#group>
>>    - note <http://roles/#note>
>>    - region <http://roles/#region>
>>    - separator <http://roles/#separator>
>>
>> landmark roles
>> <http://roles/#application>
>>
>>    - application <http://roles/#application>
>>    - banner <http://roles/#banner>
>>    - complementary <http://roles/#complementary>
>>    - contentinfo <http://roles/#contentinfo>
>>    - form <http://roles/#form>
>>    - main <http://roles/#main>
>>    - navigation <http://roles/#navigation>
>>    - search <http://roles/#search>
>>
>>
>> Is this something you are amenable to adding to your CP?
>>
>>
>> reegards
>> Stevef
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6 July 2012 00:02, Edward O'Connor <eoconnor@apple.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Steve,
>>>
>>> You wrote:
>>>
>>> > what is the source of the note? Is it in your CP?
>>>
>>> It's from r7029, which is one of the revisions my CP aims to restore to
>>> the W3C version of the spec.
>>>
>>> > How is the region associated with the control since the region can
>>> > have no properties added which define a relationship between them?
>>>
>>> Each hit region has an associated control, which is either an element or
>>> an unbacked region description. You pass in the control when you call
>>> addHitRegion(). Is this unclear in the spec text?
>>>
>>> > Soon as an author wants to go beyond simple grouping objects, they can
>>> > no longer use the lightweight objects anyway as no relationship
>>> > properties can be added to the lightweight objects.
>>>
>>> We should make the easy things easy and the hard things possible.
>>> Allowing hit regions to be associated with either unbacked region
>>> descriptions or elements allows for this: if you have a complex thing
>>> which requires WAI-ARIA states and properties to describe, use an
>>> element. If not, use an unbacked region description.
>>>
>>>
>>> HTH,
>>> Ted
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> with regards
>>
>> Steve Faulkner
>> Technical Director - TPG
>>
>> www.paciellogroup.com | www.HTML5accessibility.com<http://www.html5accessibility.com/>|
>> www.twitter.com/stevefaulkner
>> HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives -
>> dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/
>> Web Accessibility Toolbar - www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> with regards
>
> Steve Faulkner
> Technical Director - TPG
>
> www.paciellogroup.com | www.HTML5accessibility.com<http://www.html5accessibility.com/>|
> www.twitter.com/stevefaulkner
> HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives -
> dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/
> Web Accessibility Toolbar - www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
>
>
>
>


-- 
with regards

Steve Faulkner
Technical Director - TPG

www.paciellogroup.com | www.HTML5accessibility.com |
www.twitter.com/stevefaulkner
HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives -
dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/
Web Accessibility Toolbar - www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html

Received on Wednesday, 11 July 2012 21:45:05 UTC