Re: Disimproved definition of literals in Concepts; close ISSUE-94?

Markus,

if you want language-tagged HTML literal,
why not use the @lang attribute at the root of that HTML literal instead?

  pa


On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 11:38 PM, Markus Lanthaler
<markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>wrote:

> > The new definition is this:
> >
> > [[
> > A literal in an RDF graph consists of two or three elements:
> >
> > . [lexical form]
> > . [datatype IRI]
> >
> > A literal is a language-tagged string if and only if its datatype IRI is
> http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#langString, and only in this
> case
> the third element is present:
> >
> > . [language tag]
> > ]]
> >
>
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-concepts/index.html#dfn-liter
> al
>
> I'm sure you already discussed this but unfortunately I wasn't able to find
> anything relevant. Was it considered that also literals with datatypes
> other
> than rdf:langString can be language-tagged? I'm specifically thinking of
> rdf:html for example..
>
>
> Thanks,
> Markus
>
>
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
>
>
>