Re: PROV-O editorial issue: hadOriginalSource

Hello Jacek,

Thanks for your comment, and clearly, your attentive reading of the
documents!

We've created ISSUE-476 for this
https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/476

You are correct in noticing that hadOriginalSource has been changed, and
more specifically, to primary source:
http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-dm/#term-primary-source
Judging from a quick search, I think the term only still occurs a few times
in PROV-O, am I correct? (PROV-DM and PROV-N don't seem to mention it
anymore)
We'll handle your comment on our internal mailing list from here on, as not
to swamp you with emails.
You can always visit the issue URL above to check on our progress.
Thanks again!

Best regards,
Tom

2012/8/9 Jacek Kopecky <j.kopecky@open.ac.uk>

> Dear Prov WG,
> I spotted that in the LC drafts, hadOriginalSource seems to have been
> removed or renamed (could't quickly find a change log that would say
> which), but it still occurs in the document(s) here and there.
>
> May all your issues in LC be editorial like this,
> Jacek Kopecky
>
> --
> The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an
> exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC
> 038302).
>
>
>