Re: ISSUE-49 (are graphs information resources?)

Greg, see my comments below:

On 4/20/10 3:30 PM, "Gregory Williams" <greg@evilfunhouse.com> wrote:

> On Apr 20, 2010, at 1:29 PM, Chimezie Ogbuji wrote:
> 
>> In 4.1:
>> 
>> [[[
>> We recall from [SPARQL] that IRIs for RDF graphs in SPARQL queries identify
>> a resource, and the resource is represented by a graph (or, more precisely:
>> by a document that serializes a graph)
>> ]]]
>> 
>> ==>
>> 
>> [[[
>> We recall from [SPARQL] that IRIs for RDF graphs in SPARQL queries identify
>> a resource, and the resource is represented by a graph.
>> ]]]

> I thought the parenthetical was the (more) correct interpretation, so: "IRIs
> for RDF graphs in SPARQL queries identify a resource, and the resource **has a
> representation that serializes that graph**". Have I misunderstood (or are we
> saying the same thing)?

Okay, I'll make that change.  I hesitated to include the parenthetical
because it uses the word document in an ambiguous way, but now that the term
RDF document and the relationship of serialize between an RDF document and
an RDF graph has been added to the terminology, your suggestion makes sense.

-- Chime


===================================

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

Cleveland Clinic is ranked one of the top hospitals
in America by U.S.News & World Report (2009).  
Visit us online at http://www.clevelandclinic.org for
a complete listing of our services, staff and
locations.


Confidentiality Note:  This message is intended for use
only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed
and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient or the employee or agent responsible for
delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If
you have received this communication in error,  please
contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in
its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy.  Thank you.

Received on Tuesday, 20 April 2010 20:10:14 UTC