Re: opening issue-74 - Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.

On 18 Feb 2013, at 17:54, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote:

> On 2/18/13 11:38 AM, Mo McRoberts wrote:
>> In which case, I'd propose raising something which results in the following vote (or even straw poll?) in order to settle this:
>> 
>> “Is it likely to be helpful to some readers of the spec to include a short note to explain the purpose of hash URIs in the examples, or is it likely to be otherwise confusing?”
>> 
>> If the answer to that is 'the former', then we can look at tweaking the wording.
> 
> Note: others  have made the same vote request, earlier in this discussion [1]. I guess, those requests weren't clear enough.

It has been amply clear that you have made this proposal.

Others are also allowed to make proposals on this forum.

Henry

> 
> Ted:  Please note the comments above (and those in Henry's response) in relation to making the issue raised [1] clearer.

> 
> Links:
> 
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webid/2013Feb/0197.html
> [2]http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/issues/74
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Kingsley Idehen	
> Founder & CEO
> OpenLink Software
> Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
> Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
> Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
> Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
> LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/