RE: Approved Process 2015 Change that was not made in the Proposed 2015 Process Document

See below
Steve Z

From: Wayne Carr [mailto:wayne.carr@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Monday, June 01, 2015 5:29 PM
To: public-w3process@w3.org
Subject: Re: Approved Process 2015 Change that was not made in the Proposed 2015 Process Document

It looks like one of the two was made - the new definition of editorial changes at
http://www.w3.org/2015/04/Process-20150428/#editorial-change

Is it just the change to not make editorial changes go back to PR that wasn't made?
[SZ] Correct, it is only the change to allow Editorial Changes without a PR that was omitted
On 2015-06-01 10:13, Stephen Zilles wrote:
All,
In reviewing topics for Process 2016, I happened to note that the change described in
  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2015Apr/0114.html
to allow editorial changes to be made without AC Review had not been made in the Proposed Process that just completed its Review ballot.

This change should be immediately made to the Draft Process 2016 Editor's draft.

Till then we must keep the relevant Issues "pending review".
  https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/152
  https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/157

Steve Z