- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 16:02:05 -0500
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: David Wood <dwood@softwarememetics.com>, public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
On Jan 4, 2006, at 3:53 PM, Dan Connolly wrote: >> In some cases an illegal SPARQL query will be *answered* -- because, >> say, some service implements a superset of SPARQL that includes, say, >> some syntactic no-no. Thus, the cases seem to be: >> >> 1. answer illegal SPARQL queries with some results > > We did decide against that: > > "for queries that are not SPARQL Query Strings, you should return > MalformedQuery and you must not return 2xx" > -- http://www.w3.org/2005/08/16-dawg-minutes#item04 Ah, yes, so we did. I saw the "should return MalformedQuery" and took that to mean that you could return results, but the "must not return 2xx" effectively kills that reading. I will have to think about how or whether that changes my response to David or any text in the spec. Cheers, Kendall
Received on Wednesday, 4 January 2006 21:02:15 UTC