On Jun 23, 2010, at 4:46 PM, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > > Since you think the proposal was a bad idea, there must be a counter proposal you can write that isn't a bad idea. Given that the proposal is "Add an attribute", (and assuming that it copies the sentence or so to give you complete explicit editing instructions to execute the proposal), I would expect a counter proposal that explains *why* it is a bad idea to document the existing behaviour of browsers in this way. Are you saying that browsers actually do something when a usemap attribute is present on the canvas element? Which browsers? Do you have a test case? Regards, Maciej
Received on Thursday, 24 June 2010 04:59:42 UTC