Re: Re-opening ISSUE-22 on vendor-specific SQL

> So I am still unconvinced that the vendor-specific flag solves more
> problems than it introduces.
>

I see your points.


> I still prefer the proposal that said, essentially, “you can do
> vendor-specific queries but then you're on your own.” [1]
>

Maybe that is the way to go for R2RML 1.0.

Although my fear is that most real-world mapping will have some vendor
specific SQL in them, and therefore most real-world mappings will have "no
particular behavior" defined. That seems a bit startling for a spec, but
maybe I could get used to it :)

-David