- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:12:33 -0700
- To: Israel Hilerio <israelh@microsoft.com>
- Cc: ben turner <bent.mozilla@gmail.com>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Israel Hilerio <israelh@microsoft.com> wrote: >>On Thursday, June 23, 2011 1:52 PM, Israel Hilerio wrote: >>> >>>We noticed that section "4.3 Steps for committing a transaction" talks about setting the event type for the IDBTransction.oncomplete event handler to "commit". >>>Did we intend for the handler to be named "oncommit" or should the event type be "complete". >>>The current wording implies that the reason the transaction completed was because it was committed. >>>The different terms made the section a little inconsistent. >>>Do we want to change any names or keep it as is? >>> >>>Israel > > On Thursday, June 23, 2011 2:04 PM, Ben Turner wrote: >>I think "complete" should be the correct type string. >> >> -Ben Turner >> > > If everyone else agrees with Ben and me, I can work with Eliot to make the change to the spec. Sounds great. / Jonas
Received on Tuesday, 28 June 2011 01:13:29 UTC