- From: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 12:08:20 +0000
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
This seems similar to table alignment issue that David was showing at F2F. mixing stretch with other alignment values would complicate the model though... is there a convincing enough use case to justify it? -----Original Message----- From: www-style-request@w3.org [mailto:www-style-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Tab Atkins Jr. Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 11:51 AM To: www-style list Subject: [css3-flexbox] Flexbox issues 2. `box-align: stretch` does not allow sufficient control over the alignment of the box contents after the height is increased. I guess the children just act like normal boxes, and top-align themselves? This prevents us from, say, baseline-aligning boxes but still wanting a background/border to be the same height on everything. I suggest that either 'stretch' should be a valid value *in addition to* the other values, or that we should define vertical-align affecting flexbox children similarly to how it affects table cells. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 29 April 2010 12:08:55 UTC