- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 09:07:23 -0400
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Thanks, Luc. It hasn't bothered me for some time, but I hope that's not because I've become too familiar with it. Regards, Tim On Jul 3, 2012, at 5:51 AM, Luc Moreau wrote: > Hi Tim, > > For some reason, there is no record of the outcome on the tracker. > We didn't proceed with this suggestion, since it mixes the notation for instances and > the grammar. > > I am now closing this issue. > Regards, > Luc > > On 06/02/12 21:31, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >> PROV-ISSUE-240 (TLebo): highlight optionals in wasGeneratedBy([id],e,a,[t],[attrs]) [prov-dm] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/240 >> >> Raised by: Timothy Lebo >> On product: prov-dm >> >> I propose to change the ASN assertions such as: >> >> "A generation record, written wasGeneratedBy(id,e,a,t,attrs) in PROV-ASN, has the following components..." >> >> to include [] on optional arguments, such as: >> >> "A generation record, written wasGeneratedBy([id],e,a,[t],[attrs]) in PROV-ASN, has the following components..." >> >> This is to highlight the arguments that are not required. >> >> Thanks, >> Tim >> >> >> >> > >
Received on Tuesday, 3 July 2012 13:08:37 UTC