Re: Closing a few more issues

> ISSUE-7: Linked Data aspects for mapping RDB2RDF
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/7
>
> [[
> PROPOSAL: The WG is of the opinion that the charter's requirement to  
> support the linked data principles is adequately addressed by the  
> Direct Mapping and R2RML, with the caveat that ISSUE-43 is not yet  
> resolved. No further action is required beyond resolving ISSUE-43.  
> This closes ISSUE-7.
> ]]
>
> (ISSUE-43 is “Re-using public entity identifiers”.)

+1

>
> ISSUE-56: Default termType for template-valued term maps should be IRI
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/56
>
> This seems like a no-brainer to me, so perhaps it can be quickly  
> accepted without requiring further discussion. So:
>
> [[
> PROPOSAL: Resolve ISSUE-56 by accepting the change proposed in the  
> issue description.
> ]]

+1

> ISSUE-50: Validation criteria for mapping graphs
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/50
>
> This was just a call for others to review a particular section of  
> the spec. It can be closed without action, which I just did.

Agreed and thanks for closing it.


Cheers,
	Michael
--
Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
http://sw-app.org/about.html

On 20 Jul 2011, at 09:48, Richard Cyganiak wrote:

> Here are some more candidate issues that we can quickly get rid of:
>
>
>
> ISSUE-7: Linked Data aspects for mapping RDB2RDF
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/7
>
> [[
> PROPOSAL: The WG is of the opinion that the charter's requirement to  
> support the linked data principles is adequately addressed by the  
> Direct Mapping and R2RML, with the caveat that ISSUE-43 is not yet  
> resolved. No further action is required beyond resolving ISSUE-43.  
> This closes ISSUE-7.
> ]]
>
> (ISSUE-43 is “Re-using public entity identifiers”.)
>
>
>
> ISSUE-56: Default termType for template-valued term maps should be IRI
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/56
>
> This seems like a no-brainer to me, so perhaps it can be quickly  
> accepted without requiring further discussion. So:
>
> [[
> PROPOSAL: Resolve ISSUE-56 by accepting the change proposed in the  
> issue description.
> ]]
>
>
>
> ISSUE-50: Validation criteria for mapping graphs
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/50
>
> This was just a call for others to review a particular section of  
> the spec. It can be closed without action, which I just did.
>
>
>
> Addressing any of the other issues will actually require some  
> discussion/work :-/
>
> Best,
> Richard
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 20 July 2011 09:05:47 UTC