- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 09:10:09 -0800
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Cc: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, HTMLwg WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Feb 22, 2010, at 8:42 AM, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:30:04 +0100, Maciej Stachowiak > <mjs@apple.com> wrote: > >> >> Consolidating some replies... >> >> On Feb 22, 2010, at 6:12 AM, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:44:37 +0100, Maciej Stachowiak >>> <mjs@apple.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/LongdescConformingWithWarning > >>> Unlike Hixie's proposal, I think that this proposal can turn into >>> something I can support. >> >> Do you think changes are needed for you to feel comfortable >> supporting >> it? > > Fundamentally it depends what the warning *says* I think that would mostly be for validators to determine, rather than the spec. But the spec could give guidance. My proposal is that validators should encourage authors to consider alternatives to longdesc, most notably aria-describedby. Do you have any other suggestions on what guidance the spec should give on the warning? Regards, Maciej
Received on Monday, 22 February 2010 17:10:44 UTC