- From: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
- Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 05:33:23 -0400
- To: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>
- Cc: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Public RDFa <public-rdfa@w3.org>
I like the motivation here that finds common ground between rdfa, microformats and microdata. The previous work done on linked-data-api [1] seems to be primarily focused on making sparql endpoints easier to access and use. While I can definitely see the need for this, I think it's a more complicated task than defining a compact, idiomatic, human readable json serialization for rdf. Just a few notes: - I was wondering if there was going to be a default __vocab__ prefix? I think it might be a bit awkward to always require it. - It might be nice to save the bnode examples for later, once you've convinced people that json-ld is something they want to do :-) - what is a "JSON-LD Web Service"? - any plans to interject this work into the RDF Next Steps discussion [2]? Personally I would love to see a w3c endorsed json serialization for rdf ... but perhaps it's too soon? //Ed [1] http://code.google.com/p/linked-data-api/wiki/Specification [2] http://www.w3.org/2009/12/rdf-ws/
Received on Monday, 31 May 2010 09:33:56 UTC