Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. June 15, 2010

I regret that I will be unable to call in tomorrow. As I finish my
current job I've been reminded at the last minute that I need to take
my vacation time, and my family is making me take them to the beach.
:-)

Also, I noted that SemTech is being mentioned tomorrow. I will be
there for the full week, and would be happy to make time for anything
associated with the SPARQL WG.

Regards,
Paul Gearon

On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net> wrote:
> See http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-06-15 .
>
> Lee
>
>    *  Date of Call: Tuesday June 15, 2010
>    * Time of Call: 15:00 UK, 10:00 (East US)
>    * Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA)
>    * Dial-In #: +33.4.89.06.34.99 (Nice, France)
>    * Dial-In #: +44.117.370.6152 (Bristol, UK)
>    * Participant Access Code: 77277# (SPARQ)
>    * IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #sparql
> ([irc:irc.w3.org:6665/sparql])
>    * Web-based IRC (member-only): http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc (Firefox
> IRC addon: chatzilla)
>    * Duration: 60 minutes
>    * Chair: Lee Feigenbaum
>    * Scribe: BirteG? (Scribe List)
>    * Link to Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-06-15
>
> [edit] Agenda
>
>    * Admin (10min)
>          o PROPOSED: Approve minutes at
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-06-08
>          o Note: No meeting next week, except informally at SemTech
>          o Next meeting: 2010-06-29 @ 15:00 UK / 10:00 EST (scribe: )
>          o Comment handling - see
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Comments
>          o Liaisons - Is there anything to report of relevance to the SPARQL
> WG?
>                + RIF WG (Sandro)
>                + RDB2RDF WG (Orri)
>                + eGov (Sandro)
>    * Test Cases dedicated TC scheduling
>          o June 30th, 15:00 BST (10:00 EDT)
>          o Reminder: collect test cases! (ACTION-191 to ACTION-199)
>    * SemTech plans
>          o Panel on Wednesday @ 2pm
>          o Interest in informal meetup?
>    * Review function library latest - any decisions that need to be made?
> Related links:
>          o Andy's list of F&O opersators
>          o starting-points wiki
>          o design draft page wiki
>    * Decision on zero-length paths
>          o See Andy's suggestion at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010AprJun/0360.html
>          o PROPOSED: Zero-length paths are defined to match all subjects and
> objects in the graph plus any IRI literal that is the subject or object of
> the triple pattern.
>    * SPARQL Update and SERVICE in WHERE (from two weeks ago, SteveH?)
>    * Aggregate details
>          o Aggregates and SELECT * (see
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010AprJun/0342.html)
>                + Potential proposal: PROPOSED: SELECT * in a query with
> GROUP BY selects only those variables included in the GROUP BY clause (see
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010AprJun/0355.html)
>          o GROUP BY without a projected aggregate expression (see
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010AprJun/0347.html)
>          o Composite keys and sorting (see
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010AprJun/0348.html)
>    * Note pending chair issues:
>          o actions/comments/issues review
>          o solicit review from community of our WDs
>          o overview document
>
> [edit] Regrets
>
>    * Axel Polleres
>    * AndyS (at risk)
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 15 June 2010 00:18:31 UTC