- From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:34:29 -0500
- To: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
- Cc: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
I think you meant "duri URI scheme", not "tdb URI scheme". "tdb" might be better placed under 'HTTP semantics'... Focussing on domain name persistence is, I think, the wrong way to look at it. The question is not "how shall we try to address domain name persistence" but "how should we write persistent references and how would we make any chosen solution stick". Domain name persistence is just one answer. In any case I thought the session was to be about ACTION-478, which asks the latter question. As resolvable duri:s are part of the ACTION-478 decision tree I suggest we bill the session as "Persistent reference (domain name persistence, resolvable duri:, etc.)" with reference to ACTION-478. Discussing Larry's draft is really a separate topic so I recommend we discuss it at some other time. Can't do both in an hour. Jonathan
Received on Monday, 31 January 2011 16:35:02 UTC