- From: Peter Beverloo <peter@lvp-media.com>
- Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 22:31:22 +0200
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 17:17, Schalk Neethling <schalk at ossreleasefeed.com> wrote: > Hi there, > > > > I have watched one video after the other, and read articles just the same. I > know we are all unsure when to use section and when to use article. But > marking up something as simple as a blogroll as an article? This really > makes no semantic sense to me. > > > > Therefore I suggest the addition of the widget tag. Below is the most > obvious use case and makes much more sense to me. Thoughts? > > > > <section> > > ???? <widget id=?blogroll?> > > > > ??? </widget> > > ??? <widget id=?search?> > > > > ??? </widget> > > </section> > > > > Kind Regards, > > Schalk Neethling What advantages would <widget> have over <section>, <article> or simply a grouping <div>? I fail to see why <widget id="search"> would make significantly more sense than <div id="search">, or even a fieldset (because that's what a search-area usually consists of). Same goes for blog-roll, why not simply use an <ol> element? There has been a lot of discussion about the new elements lately, their use-cases and rationales, not only about <section> and <article>, but also the <aside> element. Before starting yet another discussion you might want to include several use-cases, advantages of the new element (also in terms of accessibility) and define how it's going to improve semantics in general. The term "widget" can be very widely interpreted, as a widget technically can contain anything, how is that going to make choosing a sectioning element easier? Peter
Received on Sunday, 13 June 2010 13:31:22 UTC