- From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:17:36 +0000
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
- Message-ID: <AANLkTi=Mbj7kcTqVAL-MFRvESdkQ_DC-z_HYmsQ4X4E-@mail.gmail.com>
Could i get an answer back from the chairs on the questions below prior to the february 14 cuttof date? regards stevef On 8 February 2011 10:25, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Maciej, > > you wrote: > "The Chairs have reviewed the proposals for ISSUE-122 shalott-example, and > find them both wanting as written." > > both impying that there are only 2 what about Change Proposal: Purely > Decorative Images (Section 4.8.1.1.7)<http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/purely_decorative_images>- by Gregory > J. Rosmaita <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/User:Grosmai> ? > > > anyway I have updated my change proposal > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/thematicimages#Details > > can you tell me whether the udpate has chnaged the chairs view that it is > "wanting as written" if not can you please exaplin what is wanting. > > regards > stevef > > > On 7 February 2011 19:12, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote: > >> >> The Chairs have reviewed the proposals for ISSUE-122 shalott-example, and >> find them both wanting as written. If they are not updated within a week, by >> February 14, 2011, they will be dropped from consideration. If no proposals >> remain, the issue will be closed without prejudice. >> >> * Steve's null Change Proposal does not apply a consistent resolution to >> all WG drafts, as previously mentioned by the chairs: < >> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/thematicimages>. >> >> * Laura's proposal to remove text alternative examples goes considerably >> beyond the scope of the issue, in the judgment of the chairs < >> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/TextAlternativesIssue122>. >> The original scope of the issue was about the details of one particular >> example. This proposal removes all accessibility advice for textual >> equivalents, and in the course of doing so entirely deletes a WG draft. It >> is reasonable to propose this, but not as part of this narrow issue. We >> offer the following options: >> >> ** Revise the Change Proposal to fit the narrower scope of ISSUE-122 >> (just the one example that was at issue). >> >> ** File a bug requesting the changes in the proposal, and if necessary >> escalate it. It will then be treated as its own issue. >> >> It's fine to do either or both of these things (or none if there is no >> desire to pursue the issue further). >> >> Regards, >> Maciej >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > -- > with regards > > Steve Faulkner > Technical Director - TPG > > www.paciellogroup.com | www.HTML5accessibility.com | > www.twitter.com/stevefaulkner > HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives - > dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/ > Web Accessibility Toolbar - www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html > > > -- with regards Steve Faulkner Technical Director - TPG www.paciellogroup.com | www.HTML5accessibility.com | www.twitter.com/stevefaulkner HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives - dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/ Web Accessibility Toolbar - www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
Received on Thursday, 10 February 2011 10:18:30 UTC