- From: Jose M. Alonso <josema@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:16:09 +0200
- To: Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
- Cc: eGovernment Interest Group WG <public-egov-ig@w3.org>, Anna.Zhuang@nokia.com, Kevin Novak <kevinnovak@aia.org>
Owen, Created this one per our email exchange. I remember you cannot edit the doc directly (sorry about that) but if you can respond to this one with proposed replacement text, it'll be attached to the ISSUE and we could discuss and edit accordingly. I do not oppose to make the suggested changes, not sure what others think. Copying Kevin, who edits that section. -- Jose ps: processing Anna's message next. El 20/04/2009, a las 18:12, eGovernment Interest Group Issue Tracker escribió: > ISSUE-23 (improve-definitions): improve definitions by adding B2G, > C2G and switch order [Group Note 1 -- General] > > http://www.w3.org/2007/eGov/IG/track/issues/23 > > Raised by: Owen Ambur > On product: Group Note 1 -- General > > I'm pleased to see reference to C2G at > http://www.w3.org/2007/eGov/IG/Group/docs/note#definitions However, > B2G > should also be referenced, as businesses should not only be > empowered but > also expected to provide in electronic form (preferably XML) the data > required for governmental purposes (as authorized by law and > documented in > strategic and performance plans). As implied in Anna's message, I'd > also > place C2G *before* the G2C "interaction" rather than as an after- > thought. > > >
Received on Monday, 20 April 2009 16:17:00 UTC