- From: Robin Berjon <robin@robineko.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:51:02 +0200
- To: "Tran, Dzung D" <dzung.d.tran@intel.com>
- Cc: "public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Hi, On Sep 28, 2009, at 19:24 , Tran, Dzung D wrote: > Gallery API: > • Browse for content > • List items > • Type: photo, video, audio, ..etc? > • URI > • Resource info: resolution, type > • Protocol info > • Rating > • Author, artist, genre, album, etc > • List containers > • Rights > • Move, create, remove > • Search I think that the above raises the question of the relationship with the FS API. A number of the items above are actually metadata (media type, resolution, authorial information, rights...). Are those available only through the gallery or should they be available through the FS (when present) as well? On the one hand it's tempting to define the Gallery API as just an access to well-known locations of the FS, on the other hand I'm a bit scared at the idea of specifying an ontology for file metadata (even if limited). Maybe we can make it simple though. Thoughts? -- Robin Berjon robineko — setting new standards http://robineko.com/
Received on Wednesday, 30 September 2009 09:51:48 UTC