- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 12:17:53 -0700
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Holger, thanks for this. My question now is, would we still need: sh:PropertyConstraint sh:NodeConstraint sh:property ? If (as it appears) sh:property is always followed by a node with sh:predicate, then those are redundant, and only sh:predicate is necessary. kc On 7/14/16 3:43 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: > I have started a wiki page to collect examples of how the proposed > syntax change to merge sh:Shape and sh:NodeConstraint would look like: > > https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/ISSUE-133 > > Please feel free to edit this page and/or discuss on the mailing list. > > Cheers, > Holger > > > -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Saturday, 16 July 2016 19:18:24 UTC