- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 17:26:27 -0500
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: Web Payments IG <public-webpayments-ig@w3.org>
Hi Manu,
After discussion with you I made the following edits to the Use Cases doc and propagated them
to the site:
* Section 6 now titled “Use cases”
* Given the presence of a “Refunds” use case, I have augmented Phase 4 to include “Reversals.” This led to a number
of changes:
- Removal of text in 3 that said “We are not going to include refunds as a use case"
- Addition of Reversals to 3.4. Please review the text I added.
- Addition of Reversals in other titles in the document that previously just said "Delivery of Product/Receipt” (4.4., 6.4, 7.2, 7.5)
- Created new section 6.4.3 for Reversals with the Refunds use case. Added an issue about whether to include a scenario
where the payment scheme of the refund is different than that of the original payment.
Also, I noticed that we should review how the terms payment, transaction, and purchase are used in the document. Are we using them consistently? Do we need to define “Payment” in the glossary?
Thanks!
Ian
[1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webpayments/raw-file/default/latest/use-cases/index.html
--
Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Monday, 30 March 2015 22:26:30 UTC