- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 13:30:25 +0100
- To: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: Ian Davis <me@iandavis.com>
Forwarding on behalf of Ian ... Begin forwarded message: > > Thanks Richard, > > A very slight clarification is that the example I gave was from > http://open.vocab.org/ but http://schemapedia.com/ uses the same style > of RDF. > > An example of one of schemapedia's embedded examples is: > > http://schemapedia.com/examples/68740744ab36d400d81a1d1af23701e7.rdf > > Ian > > > > On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> wro= > te: > > I just had a conversation with Ian Davis on Twitter that yielded a use ca= > se for defining datatype IRIs for graph literals. I thought I'd share it as= > input into ISSUE-5 [1]. > > > > He uses Turtle snippets as literals in SchemaPedia [2]. SchemaPedia is a = > site that helps find RDF vocabularies, and it lists example usage snippets = > for the vocabularies. The site's back-end is RDF-based. Turtle literals are= > used to store the examples, as well as change events when examples are mod= > ified. See [3] for a typical change event. > > > > Currently Ian uses plain literals, because no datatype was readily availa= > ble. > > > > The idea of abusing Ivan's format URIs from [4] came up. > > > > Best, > > Richard > > > > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/5 > > [2] http://schemapedia.com/ > > [3] http://api.talis.com/stores/openvocab/meta?about=3Dhttp://open.vocab.= > org/changes/f07ca76699a536dd38b5cbbbe1ba181d&output=3Drdf > > [4] http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/ >
Received on Friday, 8 April 2011 12:30:58 UTC