Re: ISSUE-66 image-analysis: informal consensus check

On 29 Apr 2010, at 10:13, Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>  
wrote:

> i also support the removal of the text for the spec

+1

Josh


> regards
> steve
>
> On 29 April 2010 09:22, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>> On 29.04.2010 07:08, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>>>
>>> The Chairs would like to proceed towards resolving this issue. We  
>>> have
>>> the following proposals submitted:
>>>
>>> Change Proposal: Strike paragraph allowing image analysis for
>>> accessibility.
>>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/ImageHeuristics
>>> (Recently endorsed by the A11Y Task Force.)
>>>
>>> Change Proposal: There is no problem and the proposed remedy is to
>>> change nothing.
>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Mar/0194.html
>>>
>>> Change Proposal: Include more detail about possible image repair
>>> techniques.
>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Mar/0195.html
>>>
>>> I'd like to check whether we are close to consensus on any of these
>>> options. If so, we will seek amicable resolution. If not, then the
>>> chairs will likely proceed to resolve the issue by other means,  
>>> such as
>>> via survey.
>>> ...
>>
>> I support
>>
>>> Change Proposal: Strike paragraph allowing image analysis for
>>> accessibility.
>>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/ImageHeuristics
>>> (Recently endorsed by the A11Y Task Force.)
>>
>> Best regards, Julian
>>
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> with regards
>
> Steve Faulkner
> Technical Director - TPG Europe
> Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium
>
> www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org
> Web Accessibility Toolbar -
> http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
>

Received on Thursday, 29 April 2010 09:43:14 UTC