- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 21:57:44 +0200
- To: public-tracking@w3.org
- Cc: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, Nicholas Doty <npdoty@w3.org>
On Tuesday 11 September 2012 16:37:45 Roy T. Fielding wrote: > If the UA is allowed to send DNT:0 to the first party while it is > sending DNT:1 to subrequests, or allowed to send DNT:1 to a > subrequest for which an exception call was made and the exception > granted, then the API is useless. Wasn't the API defined this way so the first party could know which of its third party get an exception? Because the first party can't know if the browser sends DNT:0 to a third party. Rigo
Received on Monday, 17 September 2012 19:58:07 UTC