- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 22:25:40 +0100
- To: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Cc: www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org
* Norman Walsh wrote: >A quick review of the SMIL spec lead me to conclude that SMIL provides >a framework to describe what information items are animatable. In >particular if a SMIL application uses the "animate" element to >describe theh xlink:title attribute as animatable, then presumably it >is. No, SMIL defines in detail which SMIL-defined attributes are animatable and which are not, other specifications like SVG do the same. In order to make a XML+XLink+SMIL user agent one needs to know which of the XLink attribute are animatable and which are not. I'm probably fine if XLink host languages, should there be such a thing, are allowed to override this, but this needs to be defined. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Monday, 23 January 2006 21:24:58 UTC