- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 02:50:16 -0500
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
I just finished compiling the Grid DoC: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid/issues-cr-2016 There's a bunch of editorial work for me and Tab, but also... Issues for the CSSWG to discuss: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid/issues-cr-2016#issue-1 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Oct/0076.html Currently, in case of a conflict where the min is greater than the max, the min wins in minmax(). This is consistent with how min/max-width work. The poster wants to invert the condition for his use case. Propose to reject for consistency, but the use case is valid and we need to find a solution for it. https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid/issues-cr-2016#issue-17 https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/955#issuecomment-276587187 It's not defined whether fr units can combine with lengths in calc(). I'm assuming we want to allow that, but need to check with implementers. https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid/issues-cr-2016#issue-21 https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/955#issuecomment-276587187 Follow-up to the decision on auto sizing of images in fixed-size grid areas: is 'normal' equal to 'start' for replaced elements without an aspect ratio? what about non-replaced elements with an aspect ratio? what about replaced items with an intrinsic size in only one dimension? https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid/issues-cr-2016#issue-16 https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/958 Request to defer subgrid on the expectation that there will be significant issues found during implementation. Since nothing has been reported yet and it is marked at-risk, I'm rather inclined to leave it where it is. ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2017 07:50:56 UTC