- From: Joe D Williams <joedwil@earthlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:56:46 -0700
- To: "Karl Dubost" <karl+w3c@la-grange.net>, "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Cc: "Shelley Powers" <shelleyp@burningbird.net>, <public-html@w3.org>
>> For example by putting <video> in the spec >> we say that we believe that this is a better way to embed video >> than >> by using <object> and flash. > Indeed, and object element is still in the spec. > http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/text-level-semantics.html#the-object-element <object> is still there because <audio> and <video> do not replace all applications of the nested browsing context and use of 'external' resources available with <object>. Anyway, to my knowledge, it is not clear whether <video> would play 'flash' movies. That might depend upon the browser's implementation of video, Try <video> with <object> fallback? Best Regards, Joe
Received on Monday, 19 October 2009 23:57:31 UTC