Re: XLink 1.1: Error handling

/ Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl> was heard to say:
| Quoting Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>:
|> This link does not conform to XLink:
|>
|>  <someElement xlink:type="foobar">foo</someElement>
|
| Your proposed text seems reanonable, but does it cover the slightly more
| complicated case of:
|
| <someElement xlink:href="test" xlink:type="bogus">foo</someElement>

Per 3.2, that doesn't conform to XLink.

| ...? Especially now xlink:type is more or less optional. And what
| should happen
| with:
|
| <someElement xlink:href="test" xlink:bogus="foo">foo</someElement>

Ah. Yes, given what we say now in Section 4, I think we need a new item
in 3.2:

  3. It does not have any attributes in the XLink namespace other than
     type, href, role, arcrole, title, show, actuate, label, from, and to.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.