Re: XLink 1.1: "markup conformance testing"

/ Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM> was heard to say:
| / Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> was heard to say:
| | * Norman Walsh wrote:
| |>/ Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> was heard to say:
| |>|   http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-xlink11-20050707/ section 3.3 requires
| |>| implementations to perform "markup conformance testing". The draft does
| |>| not define what it means to perform such testing, please change the
| |>| draft such that this is clearly defined.
| |>
| |>Markup Conformance is described in Section 3.2.
| |
| | Yes. That does not cause "markup conformance testing" to be well-defined
| | in any way though.
|
| I see your point. Would the following rewording of point 3 of Section
| 3.3 make things clearer?
|
|   3. it applies XLink semantics only to those elments which satisfy
|      the markup conformance criteria outlined in [3.2 Markup Confromance].

I have no record of your response to this question. If we do not hear
From you before 6 Jan 2006, we will conclude that you are satisfied by
this change.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.