- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 13:06:51 -0400
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Luc, The prov-o team discussed this during our telcon today. Are the property characteristics that you suggest justified by DM? You do point out that some are "PROV-O specific", but they should still have grounding in DM, right? The team thinks that these characteristics should be discussed at the WG level. Thanks, Tim On Jul 4, 2012, at 5:26 AM, Luc Moreau wrote: … > > 2. qualifiedXXX: shouldn't they be inverseFunctional? > Otherwise, this would allow for a given Influence instance, to be a qualified Influence > for multiple subjects. This is not intended. > > The qualified pattern is prov-o specific. It was inverse functional before, but I think > this characteristic was incorrectly removed. > > 3 influencer: should it be functional: there is only one influencer per > qualified pattern instance, isn't there. > > 4. Likewise: > hadPlan: is functional > hadUsage: is functional > hadGeneration: is functional > hadActivity: is functional > > As per prov-dm. > > 5. generatedAtTime: In owl file: editorialNote "It is the intent that the property chain holds: (prov:qualifiedGeneration o prov:atTime) rdfs:subPropertyOf prov:generatedAtTime."@en > > --> It cannot be functional since qualifiedGeneration is not functional. > > Also applies to all the others, invalidatedAtTime, startedAtTime, endedAtTime, > > > Cheers, > Luc > > > On 03/07/2012 21:20, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >> PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/444 >> >> Raised by: Timothy Lebo >> On product: PROV-O HTML >> >> PROV-O is ready for internal review for Last Call release. >> >> The document is at: >> >> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/tip/ontology/last-call/2012-07-03-internal-review/Overview.html >> >> Please respond to this thread with general feedback and answers to the following questions: >> >> 1) Are there any issues that should delay the WG's release of PROV-O as Last Call (i.e., is all of the technical work done). >> >> >> 2) Are the examples and scenario adequate? >> >> >> 3) Should the links to prov-dm, prov-constraints, and prov-n stay in the cross reference? >> >> Regards, >> Tim prov:actedOnBehalfOf :prov-o-team . >> >> >> >> >> > >
Received on Monday, 9 July 2012 17:07:44 UTC