- From: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:52:53 -0400
- To: public-swd-wg@w3.org
- Cc: Ralph Swick <swick@w3.org>
Reading http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-skos-reference-20080829/ , I sympathize very much with the people who want to keep the namespace the same. We're trying to get critical mass and cutting some of the data off and letting it float away by itself it is costly. I don't generate skos myself, but I have come across it. Some people think it's important. I strongly suggest giving new names (within the same namespace) to the five things which have changed, especially if they're rather obscure. You have of course to evaluate the damage if you were to just make an erratum to skos 2005. Did you in 2005 make a say about the change rules for skos 2005 I suggest to use new names and not change the namespace. Tim
Received on Tuesday, 30 September 2008 19:53:49 UTC