RE: ACTION-57 done

Sangwhan,

These code examples looks fine. Yes, I was thinking the same with examples for the use of Touch objects. I will wait for your email on blocking issues.

Thanks
Tran

-----Original Message-----
From: Sangwhan Moon [mailto:smoon@opera.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 6:14 AM
To: Tran, Dzung D
Cc: public-webevents@w3.org
Subject: Re: ACTION-57 done

Dzung, you are welcome to come up with something better - I sure think that there is plenty of room for improvement.

I haven't actually asserted against any of the Touch objects and approached in a bit more primitive approach (lengths) due to other blocking issues - details to follow on a upcoming mail.

On 2011. Aug (8). 03, at 8:07 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:

> Thanks Sangwhan. I closed action-57 and will leave its issue-18 open for a bit as a reminder that you and/or others are welcome to create patches for additional examples.
> 
> FYI, Dzung Tran mentioned he may be able to contribute an example.
> 
> On 8/3/11 6:21 AM, ext Sangwhan Moon wrote:
>> Sorry for the long delay - I've addressed a proposal for ISSUE-18 and pushed it to the repo.
>> 
>> Probably needs some clean-up. (or making more minimal examples, not sure which direction is better)
>> 

Best regards,

--
Sangwhan Moon
Opera Software ASA | Skype: innodb1

Received on Thursday, 4 August 2011 03:02:16 UTC