- From: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
- Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 22:34:02 -0400
- To: Gavin Carothers <gavin@carothers.name>
- Cc: public-rdf-comments@w3.org
On Sep 15, 2012, at 7:18 PM, Gavin Carothers wrote: >> Even in an appendix and marked "non-normative," I think this section is a mistake to include. It feels like the working group getting out ahead of actual experience, especially when there are such trivial examples that result in invalid HTML (presumably making parsing the embedded turtle data difficult or impossible). If for some reason you think this section simply must be included in the final spec, I think you should explicitly call out the issue of possibly getting invalid markup depending on the contents of the turtle data.' > > Would moving the Turtle in HTML section into a note work for you? As a > note it could mature at it's own rate and deal with some of the known > issues with embedding any kind of data in HTML. Yes, I'd be happy with that. thanks, .greg
Received on Sunday, 16 September 2012 02:34:26 UTC