- From: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 11:46:08 -0400
- To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Jul 20, 2010, at 11:21 AM, Axel Polleres wrote:
> ... there seems absolutely no way that
>
> GRAPH <http://www.example/another-named-graph> { ... }
>
> would be treaded synonuymous to
>
> GRAPH <http://www.example/named-graph> { ... }
>
> because the sameAs statement (BTW, in which graph is the sameAs statement contained?) can't affect the GRAPH name...
I think we all agree that the owl:sameAs issue isn't an issue. Damian retracted his original comment about this here:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Jul/0007.html
.greg
Received on Tuesday, 20 July 2010 15:46:39 UTC