- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:27:27 +0100
- To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Cc: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 2011-04-11, at 14:01, Steve Harris wrote: > On 2011-04-08, at 10:23, Richard Cyganiak wrote: > >> On 8 Apr 2011, at 10:05, Steve Harris wrote: >>>> rdf:Seq does have some merit, and some serious 'in the wild' usage. >>> >>> Agreed. While far from perfect, in some situations it's preferable to RDF Lists. >> >> Can you give examples where rdf:Seq is preferable to rdf:List? > > Serialising in RDF/XML / NTriples, accessing with SPARQL 1.0, referring to e.g. the 5th member. Sorry, not RDF/XML, that has syntactic sugar for it. You can add sparse vectors to the list though. - Steve -- Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK +44 20 8439 8203 http://www.garlik.com/ Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11 Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
Received on Monday, 11 April 2011 13:27:51 UTC