Re: SKOS Comment (various) [ISSUE-174]

Dear Jeremy

Thank you for your comments [1,ISSUE-174]:

Raised by Jeremy Carroll in [1]:

14) 10.6.5A missing discussion of Cycles involving skos:closeMatch.  
(editorial
or perhaps larger substantive)
Possible text:
[[
Since
<A> skos:exactMatch <B>
entails
<A> skos:closeMatch <A> (via S45, S46 and S42).
implementations must be able to cope with cycles in skos:closeMatch.
]]

This perhaps calls into question the stance in other sections where  
reflexivity
of other properties is left open as an implementation variability.

-------------------------------------------------------------

Text as suggested has been included. We have, however, made no other  
substantial change to the document in response to your comment. The  
Working Group propose to close this issue. I hope you can live with  
this.

Cheers,

	Sean Bechhofer
	Alistair Miles

[ISSUE-174] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/174
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Oct/0077.html


--
Sean Bechhofer
School of Computer Science
University of Manchester
sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk
http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/people/bechhofer

Received on Wednesday, 22 October 2008 12:08:00 UTC