- From: Marcin Hanclik <Marcin.Hanclik@access-company.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 18:17:28 +0100
- To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "HTML Issue Tracking WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Versioning and profiling seems to be the common issue throughout WGs. In SMIL3.0 we defined version and baseProfile attributes similarly to SVG. XHTML has version attribute, but seems not to have profile. Would it be possible to have one mechanism for all those specs? Kind regards, Marcin -----Original Message----- From: public-html-request@w3.org [mailto:public-html-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Dan Connolly Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 4:16 PM To: HTML Issue Tracking WG Subject: Re: ISSUE-4 (html-versioning): HTML Versioning and DOCTYPEs [HTML Principles/Requirements] HTML Issue Tracking Issue Tracker wrote: > ISSUE-4 (html-versioning): HTML Versioning and DOCTYPEs [HTML Principles/Requirements] > > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/ > > Raised by: Dan Connolly I asked that this issue be migrated from the wiki ( http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/ARIAIntegration ) because it has come up in the ARIA session discussion. http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/meetings/tp2007 minutes/notes to appear near http://www.w3.org/2007/11/06-aria-irc -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2007 17:18:27 UTC