- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 23:25:14 -0800
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Feb 28, 2011, at 3:29 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 28.02.2011 23:14, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >> >> Here is the decision. It has been drafted in HTML format to aid readability. >> ... > > I think it would be good to clarify which relations will be affected. > > It appears that the original CP <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Oct/0268.html> was about: > > "top", "first", "start", "contents", "ToC" and "index" > > while the accepted CP <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Nov/0042.html> mentions to drop: > > "index, up, first, last" > > I'm not opposed to drop things from HTML5, in particular when they have better definitions elsewhere. > > The question of validity will come up again anyway (ISSUE-27). > > However, it seems that the accepted proposal suggests not changing a few of the relations about what the ISSUE originally was opened; we may have to revisit them. The Change Proposal adopted is this: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Nov/0042.html>. Its Details section says: >>> Remove all prose relating to the following link types: index, up, first, last. This would include, by my understanding, removal of the Synonyms sections of those definitions, which include the synonyms "top", "contents", "toc", "begin", "start" and "end". Regards, Maciej
Received on Tuesday, 1 March 2011 07:26:12 UTC