Re: PROV-ISSUE-476: (Editorial comment) hadOriginalSource still occurs in LC documents [PROV-O HTML]

After some updating, 

neither
http://aquarius.tw.rpi.edu/prov-wg/prov-o
nor
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/ontology/Overview.html

contain the string "hadOriginalSource"

I have marked this issue as PENDING-REVIEW.




Procedural question (that should become reflected in http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Tracking_Public_Comments )

Should this now be raised at our weekly meeting, for WG approval to respond to the commenter?

Thanks,
-Tim



On Aug 9, 2012, at 12:43 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:

> PROV-ISSUE-476: (Editorial comment) hadOriginalSource still occurs in LC documents [PROV-O HTML]
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/476
> 
> Raised by: Tom De Nies
> On product: PROV-O HTML
> 
> This is to address the comment by Jacek Kopecky found here:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-comments/2012Aug/0000.html
> 
> Apparently, hadOriginalSource still occurs a few times in some of the documents (from what I gather by a quick search, only in PROV-O), and should be changed to primary source.
> 
> 
> 
> 

Received on Tuesday, 14 August 2012 17:34:46 UTC