- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:24:56 -0400
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>, public-prov-wg@w3.org
Shouldn't wasEndedBy and wasStartedBy be sub properties of wasAttributedTo? I think this also brings up a more general question, Stian. With the ease of "toggling" properties around the hierarchy, it would be nice to have owl:Annotations that justify why one is a sub prop of another, referencing the appropriate dm or dm-constraints anchors. Any interest in trying that out? Thanks, Tim On Apr 19, 2012, at 4:56 AM, Luc Moreau wrote: > > > On 04/19/2012 09:49 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: >> Seems Tim beat me too it.. but now the question are of the unqualified >> properties. >> > yes, he sent a message last night. >> They are currently subproperties of prov:wasAssociatedWith (range >> prov:Agent) - but I no longer read that understanding from DM. >> >> > Correct, no agent any more. It's start/end are part of component 1, whereas agent is in component 3. > >> So I've made them as well be simple subproperties of prov:involved >> with range prov:Entity. I'm also checking the ProvRDF page. >> >> > > I think that would be right. >> Luc, just to check as there are currently a bit of a mess of versions >> of DM in Mercurial, [1] is right? >> > > Yes, that's the latest, ... and right as far as I can tell ;-) > Luc > >> [1] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#dfn-wasstartedby >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 09:33, Stian Soiland-Reyes >> <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote: >> >>> You are absolutely right. I'll fix that. >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 08:52, Luc Moreau<L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi prov-o team, >>>> >>>> I don't know whether this is something that changed since our reviews, or >>>> whether I missed it in my review, >>>> but prov:Start and prov:End should be EntityInvolvement and not >>>> AgentInvolvement. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Luc >>>> >>>> >>>> On 04/02/2012 09:12 PM, Timothy Lebo wrote: >>>> >>>>> Luc, Paul, Simon, Sam, and MacTed, >>>>> >>>>> Over the past couple telecons, you have accepted to review and provide >>>>> feedback for the PROV-O documents. >>>>> >>>>> Please see ISSUE-336 for the information about reviewing PROV-O HTML and >>>>> OWL. >>>>> >>>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/336 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> If you could reply to this message when providing feedback, we would >>>>> greatly appreciate it. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> <Tim Lebo> >>>>> prov:actedOnBehalfOf<PROV-O team>; >>>>> . >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Professor Luc Moreau >>>> Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 >>>> University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 >>>> Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk >>>> United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team >>> School of Computer Science >>> The University of Manchester >>> >> >> >> > > -- > Professor Luc Moreau > Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 > University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 > Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk > United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm > > >
Received on Friday, 20 April 2012 14:26:02 UTC