- From: Henning Schulzrinne <hgs@cs.columbia.edu>
- Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:59:21 -0400
- To: Geolocation Working Group WG <public-geolocation@w3.org>
This seems like an incomplete list of proposals, given that a number of people have also proposed the RFC 4119 list. On Mar 25, 2009, at 2:15 PM, Geolocation Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > > ISSUE-3 (civic-addressing): Exposing civic addresses in the API > > http://www.w3.org/2008/geolocation/track/issues/3 > > Raised by: Matt Womer > On product: > > We've discussed including different notions of location in the API, > most notably "civic addresses". > > Civic addresses currently are being included in 'v2' or 'level 2' > of the recommendation. > > Proposals for civic addresses have included: > > * multiple forms of location simultaneously (@@url?) > > * civic addresses optionally: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-geolocation/2008Jun/0058.html > > * Microsoft/Alec Bernston's proposal: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-geolocation/2009Feb/0000.html > > The latter informed the first editor's draft of v2 as mentioned here: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-geolocation/2009Mar/0072.html > > > The main issue thus far has been in what format the address is > represented. > > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 26 March 2009 00:59:59 UTC