- From: Simon Steyskal <simon.steyskal@wu.ac.at>
- Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 12:38:08 +0100
- To: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>, Arthur Ryman <arthur.ryman@gmail.com>
- Cc: Public-data-shapes Wg <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Hi! I tried to capture all important bits and pieces of yesterday's call at [1]. Feel free to edit/extend them whenever necessary (especially if I reported them wrongly). cheers, simon [1] https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/ISSUE-95:_Metamodel_simplifications#Meeting_minutes_SHACL_metamodel_discussion --- DDipl.-Ing. Simon Steyskal Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna www: http://www.steyskal.info/ twitter: @simonsteys Am 2016-02-11 06:32, schrieb Holger Knublauch: > I had further thoughts on how to make all of us happier, and now > propose > > https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/ISSUE-95:_Metamodel_simplifications#Proposal_3_.28edited_by_Holger.29 > > The main difference is that constraint types are now shapes, and > sh:scopeClass is used instead of the new property sh:context. This > meets all my requirements and avoids the metaclass/subclass issues. > > Comment appreciated. > > Holger
Received on Thursday, 11 February 2016 11:38:41 UTC