- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 18:05:15 +0100
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
re. http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/13 With some help from Luke I've worked out a plausible definition for the LET() syntax that was in the wiki page, and shown an equivalent general form in SPARQL + SubQueries + ProjectExpressions. http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Feature:Assignment#Equivalence_with_SubSelects_and_ProjectExpressions I believe that discharges my action, and I'm never going to attempt to write algebra in wiki syntax again! - Steve -- Steve Harris Garlik Limited, 2 Sheen Road, Richmond, TW9 1AE, UK +44(0)20 8973 2465 http://www.garlik.com/ Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11 Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
Received on Friday, 8 May 2009 17:05:50 UTC